Great crowd today in Austin for CLE International’s Eminent Domain seminar, co-chaired by our colleagues Chris Clough, Sejin Brooks, and Christopher Oddo. We spoke about “National Trends and Developing Issues in Eminent Domain.”
Here are the cases I referred to which are not included in your written materials:
- “Doggone stinky” government action, but no property right in use of land.
- Ninth Circuit: “fundamental” attributes of property may be immune from state law changes
- Property rights in a “clean and healthy environment” – Hawaii vs. DC Cir (Pennsylvania law)
- Sixth Circuit: “forced pooling” statute isn’t a taking
- “Bad faith” as a way to challenge a taking
- Violet Dock Port: for “unique” property, the Louisiana Supreme Court concludes that fair market value isn’t the only measure of just compensation. Replacement cost evidence is admissible
- NJ Appellate Division: “take now, decide later” will not support redevelopment necessity.
Continue Reading Materials And Links From Today’s Austin Eminent Domain CLE




