For those who tuned in to today’s webinar Eminent Domain: Redevelopment Challenges for Local Government, here are the cases I spoke about during my session:
- Amy Lavine’s law review article with the backstory of Berman v. Parker – Urban Renewal and the Story of Berman v. Parker, 42 Urban Lawyer 423 (2010) (article posted here).
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp., 930 A.2d 160 (D.C. 2007) (pretextual takings under Kelo).
- County of Hawaii v. C&J Coupe Family Ltd. P’ship, 198 P.3d 615 (Haw. 2008) (under Kelo, trial courts presented with prima facie evidence that the stated public use is a pretext to cover up private benefit must look to the real motive for a taking even if the taking is for a “classic” use).
- County of Hawaii v. C&J Coupe Family Ltd. P’ship, 242 P.3d 1136 (2010) (the above case after remand
