Inverse condemnation

Subscribe to Inverse condemnation via RSS

We’re going to wrap up 2010 with a post on our favorite topic, inverse condemnation. While the Ninth Circuit ended the year badly by making hash of both Penn Central and Palazzolo in a rent control case, other federal courts of appeals aren’t so predictably off-key. The Federal Circuit, which hears appeals from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (the court with jurisdiction to hear most claims against the federal government for just compensation), is one in which a property owner has a decent shot at getting a court that understands the issues. 

The Federal Circuit has a “bright-line rule” that the six year statute of limitations begins to run on a physical takings claim in a rail-to-trail case when a property owner’s state law reversionary interest is blocked. Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Barclay v. United States, 443 F.3d 1368…

Continue Reading Federal Circuit: Physical Taking Is Complete When Statute Of Limitations Begins To Run

The Vermont Law Review has published an article authored by me and my Damon Key colleagues (and fellow law bloggers) Mark M. Murakami and Tred Eyerly. The article is an essay with our thoughts about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (June 17, 2010).

That’s the “judicial takings” case involving accretion rights and Florida’s “renourished” beaches. Disclosure: we filed an amicus brief supporting the property owners in the case. We argue in the article that despite eight Justices concluding the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in the case was not a judicial taking, the doctrine remains viable. The article suggests a roadmap for how future cases can be analyzed.

Download the pdf here, or get it below.

Of Woodchucks and Prune Yards: A View of Judicial Takings From the Trenches, 35 Vt. L. Rev. …

Continue Reading New Article – Of Woodchucks and Prune Yards: A View of Judicial Takings From the Trenches

Aliaba

Thursday-Saturday, February 17-19, 2011, come join us for the 28th annual presentation of the advanced-level ALI-ABA Course of Study, Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation, and the sixth annual presentation of the basic-level ALI-ABA Course of Study, Condemnation 101: Making the Complex Simple in Eminent Domain, both at the Hyatt Regency in Coral Gables (Miami), Florida. Both courses also are offered via live webcast, available either in their entirety or in segments.

Update: Register online between December 12 and December 31, 2010, and you can get a 30% tuition break. Simply enter coupon code DECS30 when you check out to receive your discount (this includes ALI-ABA’s, live and online courses, telephone seminars, webcasts and on-demand CLE, coursebooks, DVDs, mp3s, subscriptions to periodicals, books, and all online content, including forms). This offer may not be combined with other ALI-ABA discounts, group rates or bundled products. This discount is only available for new…

Continue Reading Mark Your Calendars – Feb. 17-19, 2011: Annual ALI-ABA Condemnation Law Programs

The court has posted the recording of yesterday’s oral argument in Leone v. County of Maui, No. 29696, a case that we’ve been following closely involving federal regulatory takings claims, Williamson County ripeness, and the practical effect of the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision in GATRI v. Blane, 88 Haw. 108, 962 P.2d 367 (1998) regarding zoning and planning for land in the Special Management Area.

We live blogged the argument, and now you can listen and follow along. Be warned, the file is an 84 mb mp3, so be prepared for a long download. Still not scared off? Download it here.

Briefs in the case are posted here.Continue Reading Oral Argument Recording In HAWICA Takings And Ripeness Case

We’ve been meaning to post links to these items for a while:

Continue Reading Monday Round Up

In CRV Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, No. 2009-5100 (Nov. 17, 2010), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that the EPA’s installation of a “log boom” in the Old Mormon Slough in Stockton, California as part of the remediation of a Superfund site was not a physical taking of CRV’s riparian and littoral access rights:

Here, there has been no physical invasion of the plaintiffs’ land. The log boom is anchored to the bottom of the Slough. Plaintiffs do not contend that they own the bed of the Slough. Nor do the plaintiffs claim that they own the water itself. In fact, plaintiffs admit they do “not assert that [they] owned the [Slough], the waters within it, or the Slough’s bed.” Appellant’s Reply Br. 8. Riparian and littoral rights do not convey ownership to the water but only rights to use the water.

Continue Reading Federal Circuit: No Physical Taking, No Regulatory Taking

In Building Industry Ass’n of Central California v. County of Stanislaus, No. F058826 (Nov. 29, 2010), the California Court of Appeal (Fifth District) concluded that the County’s Farmland Mitigation Program — which requires property owners to dedicate or acquire perpetual agricultural conservation easements in a 1-to1 ratio as a condition of obtaining development approvals or permits — was not facially invalid.

The trial court had invalidated the FMP on its face because the County “failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the exactions requires under the FMP and any adverse public impacts resulting form the new applications to change … to ‘residential’ uses,” but the Court of Appeal concluded that the burden was not on the County to show the FMP bears a rational relationship to farmland loss, but on the plaintiff BIA to show the FMP bears no reasonable relationship. Slip op. at 9.…

Continue Reading Cal Ct App: Farmland Mitigation Exaction Has Nexus And Proportionality

At 10:00 a.m. HST (3 p.m. EST, noon PST), the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in a case we’ve been following that involves federal regulatory takings claims, Williamson County ripeness, the practical effect of the Hawaii Supreme Court’s decision in GATRI v. Blane, 88 Haw. 108, 962 P.2d 367 (1998) regarding zoning and planning for land in the Special Management Area.

Leone v. County of Maui, No. 2969 is a case that has U.S. Supreme Court potential if the Hawaii courts don’t get it right and is definitely one to watch.

We will be live blogging the arguments starting at about 9:55 a.m. Joining me will be my Damon Key colleague Mark Murakami. We will post a full summary of the case and a set of the briefs before then.

Disclosure: we filed an amicus brief supporting the property owners in this case, available…

Continue Reading 12/8/2010 Oral Argument Live Blog: Must A Property Owner Seek To Change The Law To Ripen A Federal Regulatory Takings Claim?

The week before last, the Hawaii State Bar Association’s Real Property and Financial Services Section held a session on recent developments in land use law of interest to local dirt lawyers.

We were not able to attend (we were teaching a seminar on water law), but our Damon Key colleagues Mark Murakami, Greg Kugle (who Chairs the Section), and Ken Kupchak were able to go, and reported that the following decisions were discussed and debated:

  • County of Hawaii v. Ala Loop Homeowners, No. 27707 (July 9, 2010). In that case, the Hawaii Supreme Court concluded that state zoning statutes are “environmental laws” as defined in the Hawaii Constitution, and therefore a private right of action exists. We suggested that

…
Continue Reading Land Use And Takings Cases Discussed At The HSBA Real Property Session

Last Friday, I was on the faculty of Integrating Water Law and Land Use Planning, a seminar on Hawaii’s unique water law.

My session covered “Water Rights, Property Rights and the Law of Settled Expectations,” and provided a crash course in Hawaii land use law, the interrelationship between land use law and water law, and the limitations of the public trust doctrine.

Hawaii Water Law And The Law Of Settled Expectations

Other sessions included “Hawaiian Water Rights – Where Culture and the Law Merge,” “Amendments to the Instream Flow Standards in East and West Maui,” and “County of Hawaii Water Use and Development Plan.” Also on the faculty were my Damon Key colleague Christi-Anne Kudo Chock; Dr. Lawrence Miike, Commissioner on the State Commission on Water Resource Management; and Lawrence Beck, Civil Engineer with the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply. Dr.

Continue Reading Materials And Links From “Integrating Water Law and Land Use Planning” Seminar