This just in: the Supreme Court has issued opinions in the judicial takings case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted June 15, 2009):

JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, IV, and V, concluding that the Florida Supreme Court did not take property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Pp. 24–29.

(a) Respondents’ arguments that petitioner does not own the property and that the case is not ripe were not raised in the briefs in op-position and thus are deemed waived. Pp. 24–25.

(b) There can be no taking unless petitioner can show that, before the Florida Supreme Court’s decision, littoral property owners had rights to future accretions and to contact with the water superior to the State’s right to fill in its submerged land. That showing cannot be

Continue Reading Opinion In Judicial Takings Case – Stop The Beach Renourishment v. Florida Dept Of Environmental Protection

In Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 582 F.3d 996 (9th Cir., Sep. 28, 2009), a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the city’s mobile home rent control ordinance (RCO) was a regulatory taking. The court found the case ripe under Williamson County, and addressed the merits of the takings claim under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978).

A sharply divided en banc court vacated the panel opinion, and held that the city’s RCO did not work a regulatory taking, because the fact that the Guggenheims purchased their property subject to a rent-control regime was “fatal” to their investment-backed expectations. Our report on the en banc oral arguments is posted here. The video of the arguments is posted here. The en banc opinion is available here.

On March 11, 2011, the

Continue Reading Rent Control Takings Case (Guggenheim) Resource Page

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens recently announced that he’s retiring. In property law circles, he is most recently remembered for authoring the majority opinion in Kelo.

Here’s our collection of Stevens-related takings issues

  • David J. Breemer, . Abstract available here.

Continue Reading Justice Stevens, Takings, Kelo, And Williamson County

Thank goodness for small things. At least book collectors in Los Angeles do not need to get “secondhand book dealer” permit from the government simply because they buy used books. 

In Hopp v. City of Los Angeles, No. B215265 (decided Mar. 9, 2010; published Apr. 6, 2010), the California Court of Appeal (Second District) held that a person who collects books as a hobby and does not sell them, is not required to get a permit from the city because he is not “engaging in, conducting, managing or otherwise carrying on the business of buying, selling, exchanging or otherwise dealing in secondhand books and magaziines, secondhand text books, or secondhand educational materials.” Slip op. at 4 (quoting L.A. , Cal., Mun. Code §103.310(a),(b)).

The court rejected the city’s argument that a collector who either buys or sells books, even for personal enjoyment, is a “book dealer.” It held that

Continue Reading Cal Ct App Gives LA The Business: A Book Buff Is Not A “Book Dealer”

Maui-sign-300x225 If you want a peek behind the curtain at this humble little blog, law firm marketing expert Jayne Navarre has kindly featured it in her case study “Build a Blog – Build a Law Practice: One Lawyer’s Journey.”

It tells the tale of how and why I produce this blog, how it has helped me to build a practice, and more importantly, why it was essential in creating relationships with colleagues across time zones.

I’ve been blogging for over three years now, which in internet terms makes me an old timer. Practice was fun before launching the blog, but as Jayne notes, something did change after I launched:

Robert’s been in private practice for 30 years. Up until four yearsago, he published articles, gave presentations, was active in the American Bar Association,and hit the local cocktail circuit as much as he could in order tobuild his practice.

Continue Reading Law Blogging, Deconstructed

We average between three and five posts per week, often putting up decisions and briefs before they show up on Westlaw or Lexis. But we can’t keep up with everything — my firm and clients would probably like me to devote a bit of time to the actual practice of law. I wouldn’t want anyone to think that I do this alone, because I often rely on colleagues locally and nationwide to send items.

I’d love to acknowledge those who wish to be acknowledged. Sometimes I remmember to ask whether its ok for me to recognize the source, but I often forget to do so, and if I don’t have affirmative ok, I remain silent.

So how about this: if you think a brief, an opinion, an article, or a new story is something that might interest other readers, please send your materials to rht@hawaiilawyer.com, with a copy to

Continue Reading Submitting Items For Posting To inversecondemnation.com

The Hawaii Judiciary is now on Twitter. It looks like it will cover opinions from the Supreme Court and Intermediate Court of Appeals, as well as other judiciary news.

Check it out here.

If you don’t know what Twitter is, never mind (but you really should come join the conversation). In addition to the Hawaii courts, here’s but a few of the people you should follow:

@invcondemnation (this blog)

@georgettedeemer (Hawaii House of Reps communication director)

@hawaiioceanlaw (my law partner, Mark Murakami)

@ABAJournal

@CharleyFoster (Kauai law blogger)

@hsbpolitics (the political beat from the Honolulu Star-Bulletin)

@jesse808 (land use law blogger Jesse Souki)

@KaHuliAo (UH Law School Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law)

@konablog (Kona Blogger)

@law101 (lawprof Susan Jaworowski)

@Scotusblog (King of All Law Blogs – my term, not theirs)

@ThelmaDreyer (Hawaii House of Reps blog)

@UHLawSchool (one of our almae matres, the University of Hawaii School of Continue Reading Hawaii Courts Now On Twitter